You have found that a term you defined has been used to represent two different things. What should you do?

When a term in your documentation has been used to represent two different things, the most effective approach is to update the definition and then review the requirements that may have been affected. This ensures clarity and consistency in your documentation, as having a term with multiple meanings can lead to confusion and misinterpretation among stakeholders.

Updating the definition allows you to clarify what the term should signify in the context of the current project or system, while also enabling you to assess how this change might impact existing requirements. This comprehensive approach supports better communication and understanding among team members and stakeholders, ultimately leading to a more effective development process.

While simply choosing one meaning and documenting that (as suggested in one of the options) could provide a quick resolution, it does not address the root issue of ambiguity and might not be the most suitable or accurate representation of the term's usage. Additionally, failing to update the glossary might leave the issue unresolved, contributing to potential misunderstandings in the future.