Which of the following should be avoided to prevent ambiguity in requirements?

To prevent ambiguity in requirements, it is essential to avoid utilizing jargon and technical terms without explanation. This practice can lead to misunderstandings among stakeholders who may not share the same technical background or familiarity with the specific terminology being used. When jargon is included without clarification, it risks excluding relevant parties from comprehending the requirements properly, resulting in potential misinterpretation or oversight of critical aspects of the project.

On the other hand, using clear and specific language, structuring requirements logically, and incorporating examples are all techniques that enhance clarity and understanding. Clear language ensures that everyone involved has a common understanding of the requirements, while a logical structure helps in organizing the information in a straightforward manner. Examples support comprehension by illustrating how the requirements apply in practice, providing a realistic context that aids stakeholders in grasping the intentions behind the requirements.