Which of the following conflict resolution techniques is the least suitable for conflicts between clients and developers regarding a value conflict in requirements?

The decision matrix is often used for prioritizing and evaluating options based on specific criteria, making it a structured technique to identify the most suitable choice among different alternatives. When it comes to resolving conflicts between clients and developers, particularly those involving value conflicts in requirements, a decision matrix may not address the underlying interests and emotions that fuel these conflicts effectively.

Value conflicts generally stem from differing priorities, beliefs, and objectives between stakeholders. A decision matrix, while helpful for objective analysis, could overlook the qualitative aspects of these conflicts, such as individual values and perspectives. Thus, it may lead to a superficial resolution that does not satisfy the deeper needs of the involved parties.

On the other hand, techniques like plus-minus-interesting, compromise, and overruling can facilitate a better dialogue about sufficient understanding of each party's values and objectives. They allow for a more collaborative and engaged approach, focusing on negotiation and mediation, which are often essential for resolving value conflicts.