If the team has an aversion to processes, which type of review will probably be the most successful?

When a team has an aversion to processes, a walkthrough is likely to be the most successful type of review. This method is typically more informal and collaborative in nature, allowing team members to review the work as a group and engage in discussion without strict adherence to formal procedures or documentation.

Walkthroughs encourage participation and can reduce resistance because they are less about formal correctness and more focused on understanding the material, identifying issues, and sharing knowledge among peers. This cooperative environment can make team members feel more comfortable and engaged, fostering a sense of ownership and acceptance.

In contrast, other review types like technical reviews, inspections, and audits tend to have more structured processes and may involve stricter controls, which can be off-putting to a team that is resistant to such methods. For example, inspections require a formal process with specific roles and prerequisites, while audits often involve compliance checks and may be perceived as imposing. Therefore, the less formal nature of a walkthrough aligns better with the team's preferences and likely leads to more successful outcomes.